tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post6900034492846586938..comments2023-10-10T04:34:25.848-04:00Comments on You Are Dreaming: ObviousRandall Friendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18004296258866577268noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post-28157813757860163662010-01-23T20:48:49.785-05:002010-01-23T20:48:49.785-05:00Thanks Randall !
Your explanation and examples ar...Thanks Randall !<br /><br />Your explanation and examples are always the best.<br /><br /><br />love<br />mattyMatty Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07549348186615229513noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post-70227275803528711182010-01-23T19:45:28.883-05:002010-01-23T19:45:28.883-05:00Matty,
Who knows of duality or nonduality? That ...Matty,<br /><br />Who knows of duality or nonduality? That person is the very core of duality itself. As long as there is the assumption of an individual who knows, who sees, who realizes, how can what is inherently dualistic realize nonduality? It cannot.<br /><br />So is that a tragic misfortune? No. Because the "one who realizes" is itself the false duality. <br /><br />Where does that leave you? What shift is required? Who remains to practice?<br /><br />There is only ever What-IS - ever and ever and ever. See if What-IS is actually split down the middle first, before acting from the assumption.<br /><br />Is there a pink elephant on the moon? If there is the assumption that there is, then from there we can ask how the elephant is doing, where did it come from, how does it breathe, what does it eat, how will it get home...<br /><br />All these questions are nonsense when it is clear that the original assumption - pink elephant on the moon - is false. The questions about the elephant aren't answered, they are discarded as irrelevant and only referencing something which never existed.<br /><br />Matty never existed. Why inquire about the assumed existence. See if he existed, then ask the question. Yes?<br /><br />See if there is an actual split between subject and object, or are these two words spellbinding and projecting a reality that is false? Is there a boundary between sensing and sensation? Is there a gap or distance between experience and experiencing? Between the known and the knowing?<br /><br />If there is, then we can entertain questions about the results of this split. If there is not, then what question can remain?<br /><br /><br />love<br />randallRandall Friendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18004296258866577268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post-52669658955220635452010-01-23T18:57:13.179-05:002010-01-23T18:57:13.179-05:00Randall,
As a living being, we can see, hear, fee...Randall,<br /><br />As a living being, we can see, hear, feel and taste... one cant deny this. The thoughts appear without any effort nor can a living being choose thoughts. Looks like everything appearing is automatic for no reason and there is no control.<br /><br />Does this mean, the realisation of non duality is also automatic ?<br /><br />My question comes from a point, where for few seconds i know that there is no duality but most of the time in day to day life we get lost in duality due to "image of me" which i know is false when looked at it. But this seeing doesn't happen regularly or continously<br /><br />Do you always (i.e every moment both when you are sleep and awake ) know that this is it (i.e there is no duality) ? If yes, how does that complete shift from duality to non duality happen ? <br /><br />Does this happen with practise or is this automatic ?Matty Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07549348186615229513noreply@blogger.com