tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post2373082767499980695..comments2023-10-10T04:34:25.848-04:00Comments on You Are Dreaming: Part 5 - Diving into MithyaRandall Friendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18004296258866577268noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post-36080292180391923642012-06-11T08:26:32.122-04:002012-06-11T08:26:32.122-04:00Hello Randall,
I been thinking about the comments...Hello Randall,<br /><br />I been thinking about the comments/questions that I sent earlier.<br /><br />Is this as simple as realizing, understanding, saying... that the SEER which is a me, an ego, a reference point...which has attributes and paramaters... and the SEEN, which also has attributes and parameters...simply appear to the SEEING...and are just like any other object in the world of a million billion objects.<br />If so...then this is simply an understanding...and not an experience...yes?<br /><br />In addition, even though there is analysis along the above lines expressing as thoughts...with or without the thoughts...reality is still evident...because the thoughts are viewed as just other objects...objects appearing to awareness I have heard you say.<br /><br />Then this pure subjectivity cannot help but include everything in itself...it is truly an emptiness which just sees or knows or cognizes everything...<br /><br />There is still something missing...<br /><br />Love to you.<br /><br />Billbilltyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06726836387521342250noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post-54479224983402644482012-06-11T02:32:51.788-04:002012-06-11T02:32:51.788-04:00Hello Randall,
I have read this post a few times ...Hello Randall,<br /><br />I have read this post a few times and I really love it. There is something there which I cannot put my finger on...so to speak.<br /><br />I think I want to tknow if what is being pointed to... can it be experienced. Immediately I think well if it is experienced... then there must be parameters and characteristics...and therefore is objective.<br /><br />If Reality has no parameters which it obviously does not...how can it be experienced. It seems to me that it can only be experinced throught the relativeness of appearance.<br /><br />As soon as I create a Bill looking at an object which must both (Bill and the object) also ultimatelly be absolute in the terms that you have just posted...it seems clearly that this is it! But it is not an "experience" of reality...<br /><br />Is this ultimately simply just an understanding...just as we know the sea is not blue on investigation...yet standing back it is blue.<br /><br />Thank you.<br /><br />Love to you Billbilltyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06726836387521342250noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post-65196037914441959022012-06-07T21:24:10.272-04:002012-06-07T21:24:10.272-04:00Hi Preston,
Yes, nicely put. We are only knowing...Hi Preston,<br /><br />Yes, nicely put. We are only knowing the appearance via one means of measurement. If we use a different means, the appearance may also be different, even though it's the same thing. If we had a pair of electron microscope glasses, the world would be a lot different place.<br /><br />But which view is the correct view? Neither. Neither is absolute. It is only when we are beyond any descriptions, any objective measurement, that we can call it absolute, because any time we measure it we are seeing it in a limited way. That doesn't make it actually limited, it's just that our view or our description of it or our concepts of it are always based on a limitation.<br /><br />So the measurement of it, we call it "experience", is limited - this is the appearance of a world of things. And the only problem is that we're taking that appearance of limitation AS Absolute, therefore we're taking the world as limited, with me as just one transient thing which was born and will die.<br /><br />If we see that the appearance is not absolute AS appearance, then we have the opportunity to realize that ANYTHING that appears IS THAT - this thought, this gas pain, this annoying guy at work, your nagging mother-in-law, your feeling of insecurity or self-doubt, your bad day... no matter what the experience of it is, it never stops being WHAT-IS.<br /><br />And WHAT-IS is only divided in the appearance but not in the actuality. That's really all this is ever about.<br /><br /><br />love to you<br />randallRandall Friendhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18004296258866577268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2102779776758563952.post-57158737816183822482012-06-05T23:07:37.635-04:002012-06-05T23:07:37.635-04:00As with the bee, or a cat, what we see is dependen...As with the bee, or a cat, what we see is dependent on the tools we have to see it with. Put your hand under an electron microscope and the quantum view will reveal something else. But that "illusion" is just an appearance, the one essence expressing as that illusion. It will arise and it will pass. But the seeing is always there.jaizonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12701016179538719017noreply@blogger.com